OGSM delivers 5x the value compared standard project management
Here is a structured comparison of using OGSMSoftware.com versus Excel or a project planning tool (like MS Project, Asana, or Monday.com) to manage strategic goal alignment across an organisation with ~80 OGSMs (e.g. for departments, teams, or functions):
🏢 Scenario
Organisation Size: ~80 active OGSMs
Need: Strategic alignment from executive to team level, with auditability, status tracking, and performance oversight.
🎯 Summary
| Tool | Best For | Not Ideal For |
| OGSMSoftware.com | Organisations wanting full strategic alignment, audit readiness, and traceable execution at scale | Small teams only needing task management |
| Excel | Low-budget, one-off strategic planning or simple OGSM pilots | Large-scale rollout, audit-ready traceability, cascading |
| Project Planning Tools | Managing task execution or project timelines | Strategic goal planning, KPI tracking, team alignment |
📊 Comparison Table: OGSMSoftware.com vs Excel vs Project Tool
| Feature / Capability | OGSMSoftware.com | Excel (Manual) | Project Planning Tool |
| Structured OGSM Logic | ✅ Built-in OGSM structure (Objectives, Goals, Strategies, Measures) | ⚠️ Requires templates and discipline | ❌ Not OGSM-native; needs adaptation |
|
Goal Cascading |
✅ Top-down linkage from corporate goals to teams with live dependencies |
⚠️ Manual cross-sheet linking, error-prone |
⚠️ Can assign projects but lacks true strategic alignment |
|
Live Dashboards |
✅ Auto-updating dashboards and filters per user/team/unit |
❌ Requires building from scratch or external BI |
⚠️ Visual timelines, but not strategic metrics |
|
Audit Traceability |
✅ Tracks who changed what, when, with version history |
❌ None without complex change tracking |
⚠️ Activity logs exist but not for goal progress or impact |
|
Action-to-Impact Traceability |
✅ Clear link between actions → strategies → goals → objective |
❌ Difficult to maintain as number of sheets grows |
❌ Actions are task-based, not impact-driven |
|
User Access Control |
✅ Role-based access per team/OGSM level |
⚠️ Can be managed via file permissions, but messy |
✅ Assignable tasks and project roles |
|
Notifications & Reminders |
✅ Automated progress request cycles (monthly, quarterly) |
❌ No automation |
✅ Task reminders, not strategy progress |
|
Scalability to 80+ OGSMs |
✅ Designed for multi-OGSM environments with hierarchy and reporting |
❌ Becomes chaotic and brittle with volume |
⚠️ Projects scale, but strategy gets lost in tasks |
|
Integration (e.g. MS Tasks, Power BI) |
✅ Native and API-based integrations |
❌ Needs manual export/import |
✅ Good with task platforms, weak on BI alignment |
|
Audit Readiness (e.g. ISO/ISAE) |
✅ Aligns with compliance reporting (traceable strategy execution) |
❌ Very weak |
⚠️ Only project delivery, not audit trail of strategic goals |
|
Ownership & Accountability |
✅ Owners assigned per item (goals, strategies, actions) with live status |
❌ Owner fields possible but not enforced |
✅ Tasks have owners, but weak goal ownership |
|
Time to Implement |
✅ Fast onboarding, ready-to-use templates |
⚠️ Medium — requires upfront setup & training |
✅ Fast for tasks, not strategic alignment |
|
Cost of Misalignment |
❌ Minimal: issues become visible quickly |
⚠️ High: issues may go unnoticed |
⚠️ High: execution without strategy context |
🧠 Final Thought
If your organisation needs to align 80 OGSMs and demonstrate strategy-to-execution accountability, Excel will break under pressure, and project tools will lose the strategic thread.
OGSMSoftware.com is built for structure, scalability, and strategic discipline — with the audit trail to prove it.
Would you like a PDF version or a slide deck of this comparison for internal decision-makers or board members?